Winning cases

21 2026-10

How to recover the unpaid construction project contract debts? Attorney Li Yonghui represented a subcontracting dispute case, and the court ruled that the defen

The unpaid debt of more than 1.1 million yuan from the subcontracting contract for construction projects has been lingering for a long time without being settled. Attorney Li Yonghui handled the litigation, and the court ruled that the project payment and overdue interest should be paid.

Learn more >

21 2026-10

Attorney Zhao Chunxiao handled an arbitration case: the so-called consultation was actually reselling housing purchase quotas, helping the client recover a serv

[Case Summary] This case is a service contract dispute disguised as a "consulting service contract", but in fact involving the resale of Beijing's housing purchase quotas. In August 2022, the party concerned, Wang * signed a "Consulting Service Contract" with A Real Estate (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and paid the service fee.

Learn more >

16 2026-9

Purchasing Restrictions Policy and Housing Disputes Case | Attorney Chen Ping Helped Her Client Successfully Defend Against the Appeal in the Second Instance an

Attorney Chen Ping represented a client in a second-instance appeal concerning a house purchase dispute arising from the purchase restriction policy. The court dismissed the seller's appeal and upheld the judgment of rescinding the contract and returning the 1.8 million yuan purchase price.

Learn more >

16 2026-9

Housing Lease Contract Dispute Case | Attorney Wang Fangli Helped the Client Win the Second Instance and Have the Case Sent Back for Retrial, and Received Compe

Attorney Wang Fangli represented a client in a housing lease contract dispute. After the second-instance court remanded the case for rehearing, the client won the case in the rehearing. The court confirmed the termination of the contract and awarded compensation for the losses of the duck coop and the appraisal fees, totaling 67,229 yuan.

Learn more >

16 2026-9

The lawsuit against illegal construction and forced demolition has been successful. Attorney Qiu Juan from Beijing Henglu Law Firm helped the client protect his

The government ordered the demolition of the building within a specified timeframe. Lawyer Qiu Juan from Beijing Hengluo Law Firm helped the client prove that the house was legal and thus avoid being demolished.

Learn more >

16 2026-9

The second-instance judgment upheld the construction contract dispute. Attorney Wu Jiani from Beijing Henglu Law Firm helped the client retain the 300,000 yuan

The construction company successfully recovered the 300,000 yuan project payment in the first instance, and attorney Wu Jiani from Beijing Henglu Law Firm assisted in maintaining the original judgment in the second instance.

Learn more >

16 2026-9

Second-instance reversal of a lease contract dispute | Wang Fangli, a lawyer with Hengluo Law Firm in Beijing, helped the client to have the case sent back for

After losing the first-instance case, Wang Fangli, a lawyer from Beijing Henglu Law Firm, pointed out the procedural violations in the second-instance trial and helped the client to have the case sent back for a retrial and reversed the verdict.

Learn more >

16 2026-9

Second-instance victory in a housing sale dispute | Attorney Wang Fangli from Beijing Henglu Law Firm helped the plaintiff terminate the contract and recover a

The seller refused to release the mortgage, resulting in the transfer of ownership being impossible. Attorney Wang Fangli from Beijing Henglu Law Firm helped the plaintiff terminate the contract, get a refund of 200,000 yuan in deposit, and win 400,000 yuan in breach of contract damages.

Learn more >

16 2026-9

The developer failed to deliver the house on time for more than 120 days. Lawyers Xue Suhua and Wang Dong from Hengluo Law Firm helped the buyer terminate the c

The developer failed to deliver the house on time for more than 120 days, so the buyer entrusted lawyers Xue Suhua and Wang Dong from Henglue Law Firm to sue for the rescission of the contract. The court ordered the rescission of the purchase contract, and the developer was required to return the purchase price of 483,638 yuan that had been paid.

Learn more >

16 2026-9

In the dispute over the construction contract, Attorney Wu Jiani helped the client recover 300,000 yuan in unpaid project funds

After the completion and delivery of the project, the employer defaulted on the payment of 300,000 yuan in project funds. Attorney Wu Jianni asserted the principle of contractual relativity, and the court ruled that the employer should pay the full amount of 300,000 yuan.

Learn more >

16 2026-9

The other party claimed that the house donation contract was invalid and demanded its return, but the court dismissed the claim! Henglu Law Firm helped the clie

After the parents' property was notarized and gifted to their daughter, the gift was sued as invalid. Henglu Law Firm represented the recipient of the gift, and the court dismissed the plaintiff's claim to protect the housing property.

Learn more >

16 2026-9

Can the 1.26 million yuan purchase deposit be refunded if the buyer loses their eligibility to purchase a home due to purchase restrictions? Attorney Chen Mei'a

Due to losing the eligibility to purchase a house due to the purchase restrictions, the applicant paid 1.26 million yuan. Attorney Chen Mei'o from Beijing Henglu Law Firm represented the applicant, and the court ruled to rescind the purchase agreement and return 1,244,860 yuan to the applicant.

Learn more >

16 2026-9

Ten years ago, was the mispelling of the address on the judgment document the reason why the client couldn't register his household registration? Attorney Qiu J

Ten years ago, a typo in the address on the judgment document made it impossible to register the household registration. Lawyer Qiu Juan from Beijing Hengluo Law Firm intervened, and the court ruled to correct the error and solved the problem.

Learn more >

16 2026-9

The heating project payment was withheld as "invoice tax"? Beijing Hengluo Subin Kai Law Firm helped the construction workers recover more than 290,000 yuan

The heating project payment was withheld as tax on the invoice. The lawyer representing Beijing Hengluo Subo Kai Law Firm won the case, and the defendant was ordered to pay the project payment of 299,230.90 yuan.

Learn more >

16 2026-9

The actual constructor was denied payment of 5.23 million yuan in project funds? Attorney Li Yonghui from Beijing Henglu Law Firm won the case of the constructi

After completing the renovation and transformation project in Xicheng District, the actual constructor, Wang * was owed over 5.23 million yuan in project payments. Li Yonghui, a lawyer from Beijing Henglu Law Firm, focused on the legal effect of the settlement signature and the burden of proof for the statute of limitations. The court ruled that the defendant should pay 5.231415.13 yuan.

Learn more >