The Water Authority evaded the issue by citing national secrets and provided a reply beyond the deadline. Attorney Xie Chao Li confirmed in his review that the authority's response to the request for information disclosure was illegal.
Learn more >
The aquatic products company has not received compensation for the past ten years. Attorney Xie Chao Li reviewed and revoked the reply from the district government and ordered it to make a compensation decision within six months.
Learn more >
The disclosure of land expropriation information was overdue, and the authorities only replied via WeChat. Attorney Xie Chao Li reviewed and revoked the original reply and ordered the authorities to provide a new response within a specified timeframe.
Learn more >
A hundred peach trees were forcibly cleared. Attorney Xie Chao Li confirmed that the town government violated the law by failing to follow the statutory procedures for forcible clearance, laying the foundation for subsequent rights protection.
Learn more >
The trees on the self-owned land were suddenly cleared without notice. Attorney Xie Chao Li confirmed that the town government's forced clearance action was illegal, and the defendant should bear the case acceptance fee.
Learn more >
The housing identification for the Tianjin shantytown renovation project has not been issued after the deadline. Attorney Xie Chao Li represented the client in the appeal and ordered the district government to make the identification result within 60 days.
Learn more >
The compensation for the 70 mu of land expropriation remains unresolved. Attorney Xie Chao Li represented the villagers' group in the appeal, and ordered the county government to fulfill its duty of compensation and resettlement within a specified time limit.
Learn more >
The neighbor's illegal construction caused water seepage on the wall. Lawyer Ma Qianwen represented the client in the appeal, and the town government's perfunctory response was revoked, and the town government was ordered to fully perform its duties and investigate the case.
Learn more >
After the first-instance court confirmed that the forced demolition was illegal, the other party appealed. Attorney Qiu Juan represented the client in the second-instance trial and successfully argued that the appeal should be dismissed and the original judgment should be upheld. The illegality of the forced demolition was thus finally confirmed.
Learn more >
The factory was demolished without a formal demolition notice, and Attorney Qiu Juan confirmed that the demolition actions taken by the neighborhood office and the housing and urban-rural development bureau were illegal, protecting the rights and interests of the client.
Learn more >
The former technical director sought 2.12 million yuan in compensation. Lawyer Xue Suhua represented Company A in providing evidence of their cooperative relationship. The court determined that there was no employment relationship between them and dismissed the claim.
Learn more >
Liu Shufen printed a will, bequeathing the house to her three granddaughters, but Chen Jianjun denied its validity. Attorney Li Yonghui acted as the agent, and the court ruled that the will was valid, with the house being divided according to the terms of the will.
Learn more >
The grandson is contesting the inheritance of the house according to the will. Li Yonghui, a lawyer with Hengluo Law Firm in Beijing, is representing the four children to defend their share of the inherited property.
Learn more >
The two wills stipulate that the two sets of properties shall be inherited by us. Attorney Li Yonghui from Beijing Henglu Law Firm successfully litigated the inheritance case on our behalf.
Learn more >
According to the will, the inheritance should be divided equally. The attorney of Beijing Hengluo Law Firm, Li Yonghui, rejected the claim of the other party to inherit 70% more of the estate.
Learn more >
