[Direct answer]In the Beijing area, if the landlord refuses to return the deposit without a valid reason after the lease expires or the contract is terminated, the lessee can sue for legal protection according to the law. According to Article 509 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China, the parties shall perform their obligations in full in accordance with the agreement; Article 577 stipulates that those who fail to perform their contractual obligations shall bear breach of contract liability; the deposit is usually used to guarantee the performance of the lease. When the lease relationship terminates and there is no arrears in rent or damage to the house, the landlord shall return the deposit in accordance with the agreement. To sue, you need to prove that you have returned the house in accordance with the agreement and there are no reasons for deducting the deposit unlawfully. It is recommended to send a letter of reminder first and fix the handover records. If no agreement can be reached, you can sue the people's court of the place where the house is located. For more details, please refer to the following link:Creditor-debtor relations and enforcement case services.
I. Problem Background and Typical Scenarios
The non-refundable deposit is a common dispute in housing leases. Typical scenarios include: when the lease expires and the tenant moves out as agreed and settles the utilities, the landlord deducts or even refuses to refund the deposit on vague grounds such as "wall stains" and "furniture wear and tear"; when the contract is terminated early, the landlord delays the refund; and when the sub-landlord absconds with the money, the real landlord refuses to refund on the grounds of not receiving the rent. Many tenants choose to tolerate it because the amount of the deposit is not large, or they fail to confirm the handover when moving out, making it difficult to provide evidence later. In fact, the deposit is essentially a guarantee payment, which should be refunded when the lease ends and the tenant does not breach the contract, and it is not a sum that the landlord can arbitrarily withhold. For disputes involving the handover of the house, it can be combined with the following methods to resolve them:Real estate sales and construction project servicesClarify the delivery standards.
II. Key points of contention
There are three key points of such disputes. Firstly, the refund conditions: the deposit is refunded on the premise that the lease relationship ends, the tenant has no arrears in rent, and there is no improper damage to the house. The landlord needs to prove the existence of deductible reasons. Secondly, the reasonableness of deduction: the boundaries between normal wear and tear and intentional damage are blurred, and the landlord cannot deduct the money on the grounds of natural wear and tear. Thirdly, the burden of proof: if the landlord claims to deduct the money, he/she should provide evidence of the losses and expenses, rather than making a unilateral determination. For the interpretation of contract clauses, reference can be made to the relevant provisions of the Contract Law of the People's Republic of China.Business and contract dispute resolution services for enterprisesDetermine the validity of the agreement.
III. Professional analysis by Hengluo Lawyers
Based on practical observations in handling housing lease disputes, the most common problem in cases where the deposit is not refunded is the "lack of evidence of handover". According to Article 509 of the Civil Code on the principle of full performance and Article 577 on breach of contract liability, if the landlord withholds the deposit without a legitimate reason, it constitutes a breach of contract, and the tenant can claim its return and request compensation for interest losses. Hengluo Lawyers usually advise tenants to jointly inspect the house with the landlord, sign a handover document, and take photos and videos when moving out, to clarify the status of the settlement of water, electricity, and gas fees, and to fix the fact that "the house has been returned in accordance with the contract". If the landlord subsequently deducts money for unfounded reasons, the tenant can use the handover records to require the landlord to provide evidence of actual losses. Applying pressure through written letters during the negotiation stage is often more cost-effective than directly suing. For cases involving the enforcement of payments, it can be followed up accordingly.Creditor-debtor relations and enforcement case servicesPromote the collection of payments.
IV. Practical suggestions and legal basis
The legal basis is Article 509 (Full Performance of Obligations), Article 577 (Liability for Breach of Contract), Article 579 (Performance of Monetary Debts), and Articles 703 to 733 (Provisions on Lease Contracts) of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China (effective January 1, 2021); together with the supporting "Measures for Payment of Litigation Costs" and the jurisdiction rules of the court where the property is located. Practical suggestions: Settle all fees before moving out and keep the receipts; jointly inspect the property with the landlord, sign a handover document, and keep the records on camera; if the landlord refuses to return the deposit, first send a letter of reminder and set a reasonable deadline; if no agreement is reached, file a lawsuit within the statute of limitations with the court where the property is located to claim the return of the deposit and the interest on the occupancy. For cases involving leases, relevant provisions of the Civil Code may also be referenced.Special services and other case servicesEvaluation.
5. Hengluo Law Firm's Advice
If the landlord refuses to return the security deposit, don't just assume that "it's not a big deal if the amount is small" or take drastic measures like changing the locks or forcibly occupying the property, which may lead to legal repercussions against you. When moving out, it's essential to conduct a thorough handover and confirmation, and document the "return of the property in good condition and settlement of all fees" in written and visual evidence. During communication, require the landlord to provide a detailed list of deductions and supporting documents, and refuse to accept vague deductions. After gathering all necessary evidence, first send a written notice to the landlord, and if they still refuse to return the deposit, promptly file a lawsuit to avoid exceeding the statute of limitations. If you need professional assistance, you can seek help from a lawyer or legal service provider.Special services and other case servicesDraft the reminder letter and the complaint petition.
VI. Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: If the landlord refuses to return the security deposit, can I win the lawsuit?
The outcome of the case depends on whether the evidence is sufficient to prove that "the lease term has ended and there are no grounds for the landlord to withhold the deposit". According to Articles 509 and 577 of the Civil Code, the deposit, as a guarantee of performance, should be refunded if there is no unpaid rent or damage to the property; if you can provide the handover receipt, inspection photos, and proof of payment settlement, and the landlord cannot provide evidence of actual losses, the court will usually support the return of the deposit. Conversely, if there is indeed unpaid rent or unrepaired damage, the landlord can deduct the corresponding amount. Therefore, the key is to keep records of the handover and not to make unfounded claims. Don't believe in unrealistic promises of guaranteed victory.
Q2: To sue the landlord for the return of the security deposit, what evidence do I need to prepare?
The core evidence includes: the housing lease contract and the deposit receipt (proving the amount of the deposit and the agreement on its return), the payment receipts for the rent and utilities, the handover form and on-site photos and videos (proving that the house was returned in good condition), the communication records with the landlord about the return of the deposit (proving that the landlord refused to return the deposit or deducted it without justification), and the landlord's identity information and the address of the house. The evidence aims to prove that "the obligations have been fulfilled according to the contract and there are no grounds for deduction". The more complete the materials are, the more reliable the claim for the return of the deposit will be, and it can also avoid the difficulty of providing evidence when leaving the house hastily during the handover process.
Q3: How much will it cost in attorney's fees and litigation fees to sue the landlord for not refunding the security deposit?
The litigation fees are calculated according to the "Measures for the Payment of Litigation Fees", based on the amount of the litigation request (i.e., the amount of the deposit) and accumulated in stages. Cases with smaller subject matters have lower fees, which are borne by the losing party. Lawyer's fees are charged based on the complexity of the case and the amount of the subject matter, either on a fixed fee basis or as a percentage of the subject matter amount, subject to the specific provisions of the entrustment contract. There is no uniform standard. Since the amount of the deposit is usually not large, it is recommended to first assess the costs of litigation fees and lawyer's fees. For cases with clear facts, you can consider litigating on your own or applying for legal aid to keep the cost of protecting your rights within a reasonable range.
Q4: How long does it usually take to get back the money in a lawsuit over a deposit dispute?
The timeframe depends on the procedures and the specific circumstances of the case. For ordinary first-instance proceedings, the case must be concluded within six months; for summary proceedings, it must be concluded within three months. For disputes over small deposits with clear facts, summary proceedings or even small claims litigation are often used, with a shorter timeframe. If the landlord appeals, the second-instance proceedings generally take three months. After the judgment takes effect, if the other party refuses to return the money, it is necessary to apply for forced execution, the execution period of which depends on the situation of the property investigation and control. Overall, it often takes several months from the filing of a case to the recovery of the money. It is recommended to apply for property preservation simultaneously during the litigation to prevent the landlord from transferring funds and shorten the actual time for recovering the money.
Q5: If the landlord refuses to return the security deposit, what should I do first?
It is recommended to proceed in four steps: First, check the house with the landlord when moving out, sign the handover form and take photos and videos, and settle the water, electricity, gas and property fees and keep the receipts; Second, send a written letter to the landlord requiring him to return the deposit within a reasonable time limit, list the facts of performance and attach evidence, and keep the delivery records; Third, if no agreement is reached, submit a lawsuit and evidence to the court where the house is located, claiming the return of the deposit and interest during the occupation period; Fourth, if the landlord still refuses to return the deposit after the judgment takes effect, apply for enforcement in a timely manner. Throughout the process, avoid excessive actions and proceed steadily with written and video evidence as the most reliable approach.
The above questions and answers are mainly based on the judicial practice in Beijing. There may be differences in the adjudication opinions in different regions. It is recommended to consult a professional lawyer based on the specific circumstances of the case.
If you are currently facing similar problems, it is recommended that you consult a professional lawyer as soon as possible with the relevant evidence, to avoid missing the statutory time limit.Legal services for creditor-debtor disputes·Beijing Henglu Law Firm
Disclaimer: This article is compiled based on the current effective laws and regulations and public adjudication rules, and is for general reference only. It does not constitute a formal legal opinion on specific cases. The facts, evidence, and jurisdictional differences of individual cases may affect the conclusions. In the event of a dispute, please consult a practicing lawyer in a timely manner.