[Direct answer]Yes. Ending this enforcement is not the end of the case, but a "pause": as long as the creditor's claim has not been satisfied, once the debtor is found to have enforceable property or clues, the creditor can apply for resuming enforcement at any time, and is not subject to the statute of limitations for applying for enforcement. After the end of the final enforcement, the main battlefield shifts from "waiting for the court to investigate" to "digging up clues by oneself" —— adding shareholders, exercising the right of subrogation, exercising the right of revocation, and issuing reward notices are all professional methods to revive the final enforcement cases.

I. Problem Background and Typical Scenarios

High-incidence scenarios of terminating enforcement: The debtor has no houses, cars, or deposits under his/her name, and the online investigation and control have failed twice. The court rules to terminate enforcement; the company, as the debtor, has no funds in its account, but the boss is still operating normally; the property transferred to the ex-spouse after the divorce settlement has long been transferred to the ex-spouse's name. Many creditors believe that terminating enforcement means "there's no hope after enforcement is completed", and the judgment will be shelved forever. In fact, the ruling to terminate enforcement only suspends the current procedure. The creditor's rights still exist, and the key to resuming enforcement is in the creditor's own hands - it all depends on whether they can find the assets.

II. Key points of contention

First, the conditions for resuming enforcement. Based on the premise of "discovery of enforceable property or property clues," the clues may be newly discovered or have not been disposed of before the final settlement (such as properties awaiting seizure, and jointly owned property awaiting division). Second, whether the company can be traced through when it has no assets. If the company's shareholders have not paid their subscribed capital in full, withdrawn their capital, or engaged in asset commingling, the debt can be traced from the company level to the shareholder level by adding the debtor to the enforcement list or suing the shareholders separately for liability. Third, the methods of obtaining clues. A combination of self-inquiry, lawyer's investigation orders, property declaration verification, audits, reward announcements, and enforcement reward insurance can be used.

III. Professional analysis by Henglue Lawyers

This case is handled by Beijing Henglu Law FirmYuan HangThe lawyer (practice license number: 11101202110286151, subject to the document issued by the judicial administrative authority) acted as the agent in this case, which is a typical example of successfully reversing a terminated enforcement case. Ma * won the intermediary contract dispute against Company A, and the effective judgment ordered Company A to return the intermediary service fee of 423,500 yuan. After enforcement, Company A had no executable assets, and the case was terminated. Ma * then entrusted a lawyer to handle it. The lawyer did not stop at the low-dimensional action of "checking the deposit again", but retrieved the business registration archives and investment information, discovering that the two shareholders of Company A, Liu * and Zhang *, each subscribed 9 million yuan and 1 million yuan, with the subscription period ending in September 2039. However, there were no actual payment records in the archives. The fact that the subscription period had not expired did not mean safety. Since the company, as the debtor, had exhausted all executable assets and met the criteria for bankruptcy but did not apply for bankruptcy, the shareholders' subscription period interests were lost, and they could claim accelerated maturity. Based on this, the lawyer filed a lawsuit against the shareholders for damaging the company's creditor's interests, claiming that the two shareholders should bear supplementary compensation liabilities for the part of the company's unpaid debts within their unsubscribed amounts. The court ruled in favor of the claim: Liu * should bear responsibility within the amount of 9 million yuan, and Zhang * should bear responsibility within the amount of 1 million yuan. The terminated enforcement case was thus revived, and the executable assets increased from "zero" to "millions of yuan". Returning to the general methodology, the action list after terminated enforcement includes: first, review the pre-enforcement investigation results to identify assets that were sealed but not disposed of, or assets that were on the waiting list but not executed; second, deeply investigate the debtor's structure - check the shareholders' investment and related relationships for companies, and check the marital property, agency holding, and mature claims for natural persons; third, make good use of procedural tools: lawyer's investigation orders, property declaration orders, audits, and rewards; fourth, add and sue concurrently. If it is impossible to add the debtor as a defendant, sue promptly. The two paths are not conflicting. The enforcement linkage mechanism in Beijing is mature, and the efficiency of case filing and property verification after resuming enforcement is relatively high. The key is to provide "specific property clues", rather than vague statements like "he has money". 律师（执业证号：11101202110286151，以司法行政机关核发证件为准）代理，是终本翻盘的典型样本。马某与A公司的居间合同纠纷胜诉，生效判决判令A公司返还居间服务费423500元；强制执行后A公司名下无财产可供执行，案件终本，马某委托律师接手。律师没有停留在“再查一遍存款”的低维动作，而是调取工商档案与出资信息，发现A公司两名股东刘某认缴900万元，张某认缴100万元，认缴期限均至2039年9月，档案中均无实缴记录——认缴期限未到不等于安全，公司作为被执行人已穷尽执行无财产、具备破产原因而不申请破产的，股东的出资期限利益丧失，可以主张加速到期。律师据此提起股东损害公司债权人利益之诉，主张两股东在未出资范围内对公司不能清偿部分承担补充赔偿责任，法院判决支持：刘某在900万元、张某在100万元范围内担责。终本案件就此复活，且可执行财产的盘子从“零”扩到了“千万级”。回到一般方法论，终本后的动作清单：第一，复查终本前的查控结果，找出“查封了但没处置”、“轮候在先但未轮到”的资产；第二，深挖被执行人结构——查公司股东出资与关联关系，查自然人婚姻财产、代持、到期债权；第三，用好程序工具：律师调查令、财产申报令、审计、悬赏；第四，追加与另诉并行，追加被执行人不成时及时另诉，两条路径不冲突。北京地区执行联动机制成熟，恢复执行的立案与财产核查效率较高，关键是线索要“具体到财产”，模糊的“他有钱”不如一个车牌号。

IV. Practical suggestions and legal basis

The first step is to organize the property profile: sort out the identity, occupation, family members, and corporate employment information of the debtor, and identify possible areas where assets may be hidden. The second step is to apply for an investigation order: the attorney holds the order to inquire into the debtor's bank accounts, real estate, equity, provident fund, insurance policies, etc. The third step is to apply for additional procedures: if the shareholders have not made actual payments, withdrawn funds, or engaged in asset commingling, apply to add the debtor to the enforcement list. If the application is rejected, file a separate lawsuit. The fourth step is to submit a restoration application: after confirming the clues, submit a restoration application and supporting evidence to the original enforcement court. Main legal basis: - The Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China (amended in 2023) regarding enforcement procedures; - The Supreme People's Court's "Regulations on Strictly Regulating the Termination of This Enforcement Procedure" (implemented in 2016) regarding the conditions for terminating enforcement and restoring enforcement; - Article 17 to 22 of the Supreme People's Court's "Regulations on Various Issues Concerning the Modification and Addition of Parties in Civil Enforcement" (amended in 2020) (regarding adding unpaid shareholders, etc.); - Article 6 of the "Memorandum on the Work of Civil and Commercial Trials of the National Courts" (Nine Civil Memorandum) regarding the accelerated maturity of shareholders' contributions; - Specific applications shall be subject to the currently effective laws and regulations.

5. Henglu Law Firm's Advice

The key steps in handling a Terminal Enforcement case do not come after the Terminal Enforcement process, but rather before it: all investigation records, equity structures, and property clues must be archived before the Terminal Enforcement process, so that effective measures can be taken afterward. The validity period of the judgment is lifelong, and the enforcement initiative determines whether the creditor's rights will turn into worthless paper. Cases involving the resumption of Terminal Enforcement and the enforcement against additional shareholders can be handled through the following channels:Creditor's rights and debts, and enforcement casesThe service provides a comprehensive solution, which can be used as a reference for corporate debt and shareholders' investment responsibilitiesBusiness and contract disputes in enterprisesFor cases involving property holding and division of assets, it may be appropriate to combine them into one arbitration panelSpecialised legal servicesFor criminal charges involving refusal to comply with the law, please pay attention to the following information.Criminal legal services.

VI. Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: After the termination of the bankruptcy proceedings, does the court still investigate the debtor's assets?

After the conclusion of the bankruptcy proceedings, the court will regularly screen the assets through the Total-to-Total Network Inspection and Control System and automatically recover the assets found; however, the system's coverage is limited, so it's more important to actively search for clues.

Q2: Is there a time limit for resuming the execution of the judgment?

No. There is no time limit for applying to resume enforcement. You can apply at any time when you find clues to the debtor's assets.

Q3: If the shareholders' subscribed capital payment period hasn't arrived yet, can they really be sued for it?

If the company, as the party subject to enforcement, has exhausted all means of enforcement and has no assets, and meets the conditions for bankruptcy but fails to apply for bankruptcy, the investment maturity will be accelerated, and the shareholders shall make up for the compensation within the scope of unpaid investment.

Q4: What should I do if I find that the property has been transferred to my spouse's name?

It is possible to apply for additional compensation or initiate a lawsuit for division of marital property or for the creditor's right of revocation. The shares of the jointly owned property during the marriage can be subject to enforcement.

Q5: How specific should the clues be?

The more specific the information is, the more effective it will be: the location of the property and the property rights certificate number, the vehicle license plate, the equity registration information, and the insurance policy number can all directly trigger verification and disposal.

The above content is based on the judicial practices in the Beijing area. The facts of individual cases and the jurisdiction of the court may affect the conclusions. Welcome to consult Henglue Lawyers about specific situations.

If you are currently facing similar problems, it is recommended that you consult a professional lawyer as soon as possible with the relevant evidence, to avoid missing the statutory time limits.Legal services for creditor-debtor disputes·Beijing Henglu Law Firm

Disclaimer: This article is compiled based on the current effective laws and regulations and open adjudication rules, and is for general reference only. It does not constitute a formal legal opinion on specific cases. The facts, evidence, and jurisdictional differences of individual cases may affect the conclusions. If a dispute arises, please consult a practicing lawyer in time.