[Direct answer]In the Beijing area, the reward itself is not prepaid: the applicant for enforcement submits a written application for a reward to the enforcement court, and the court issues a reward announcement. The reward money is paid from the enforcement funds according to the promised proportion after the property is actually executed—that is, the reward is paid after the clue is provided. The announcement is published by the court through media or platforms. The reward proportion is determined by the applicant's commitment and the court's review, and it is usually a certain percentage of the actual amount collected during the enforcement. If no one provides a valid clue, no reward money will be paid out.

I. Problem Background and Typical Scenarios

After two years of fruitless enforcement, the applicant for enforcement heard that the announcement of a reward could mobilize social forces to locate the assets, but he was worried: Would the announcement cost money? How would the reward be calculated? What if the money was paid but the assets couldn't be found? The design of the reward system is precisely result-oriented—only when the target is in sight should the incentive be offered.

II. Key points of contention

First, the setting of the conditions and proportion for reward payments. Second, the procedures for applying for rewards and the channels for announcing them. Third, the eligibility restrictions for whistleblowers and the determination of the validity of the clues. Fourth, the coordination between rewards and other property investigation measures.

III. Professional analysis by Henglue Lawyers

The first layer clarifies the payment rules: The reward will be paid on the premise that the clues are true and the property is actually executed, with the proportion determined by the applicant at the time of application (commonly ranging from a few percent to 10% of the amount actually executed, subject to court review for reasonableness). If the property is not executed, the clues are false, or the informant falls within the statutory exclusion scope, no payment will be made—the risk exposure of the applicant is limited to successful recovery of funds. The second layer describes the application and release process: Submit a bounty application to the executing court, specifying the information of the debtor, the reward ratio, and the payment commitment. After review by the court, the information will be released via the National Enforcement Bounty Announcement Platform, local media, or the court's official account. The announcement typically conceals the identity of the applicant to prevent the debtor from transferring assets in advance upon detection. Online release channels in Beijing courts are well-developed, with satisfactory coverage and response speed. The third layer focuses on disputes over the validity of clues: Informants cannot be the debtor's legal representative, agent, or state employees subject to mandatory investigation; duplicate clues will be determined based on their timeline; and the value of clues will be measured by the actual results of seizure and disposal. It is crucial to specify the payment conditions in detail (based on the actual amount executed or the value of the property) to avoid disputes later. The fourth layer emphasizes the integrated use of bounties with other enforcement measures: Combined with restrictions on high-consumption lifestyles, credit blacklists, and travel restrictions, the announcement itself creates public pressure on the debtor, often leading to their voluntary settlement after publication. Clues obtained through bounties (e.g., external debts, equity, and vehicle hiding locations) are further investigated and verified by lawyers before being converted into enforcement actions. Only when the clues are successfully monetized does the process reach a closed-loop. Extended procedures such as external debt enforcement and subrogated litigation also require professional follow-up.

IV. Practical suggestions and legal basis

The first step is to assess the necessity of offering a reward when the investigation has reached a deadlock or made no progress. The second step is to set a reasonable reward ratio and clarify the payment conditions. The third step is to pay attention to the feedback from the announcement and apply to the court for verification and control of the clues in a timely manner. The fourth step is to follow up on the disposal process until the repayment is received. The types of clues offered as rewards are worth noting: external debts, held equity, the location of hidden vehicles, and the flow of rent and deposits may all be common contents of the feedback from the announcement. After obtaining the clues, don't just stop at registration. Let lawyers initiate corresponding enforcement or subrogation procedures according to the type of clues, so that the clues can truly turn into money. For the recovery of external debts involving contract and accounts receivable management, it can be combined with other measures.Business and contract disputes in enterprisesDesign the recovery path in synchronization with the plate. The main legal basis: Articles 21 to 23 of the "Regulations of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning Property Investigation in Civil Enforcement" regarding the provisions on reward announcements, and the relevant provisions on enforcement measures in the "Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China"; the specific application shall be subject to the currently effective provisions.

5. Henglue Law Firm's Reminder

Three suggestions for offering rewards: Do not charge an upfront fee, and pay the reward based on the actual amount received; Write detailed provisions on the validity of the clues and specify clear payment conditions; Combine rewards with restrictions on high-consumption and trust-breaking behaviors, and use public opinion and measures in tandem. For matters involving the execution of rewards and property investigations, you can seek assistance through the following channels:Creditor's rights and debts, and enforcementObtain a comprehensive solution for the service, involving the combination of external creditor claims recoveryBusiness and contract disputes in enterprisesPlate, reference for difficult execution casesSpecial servicesColumn.

VI. Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Is there a statutory cap on the reward ratio?

The law does not set a fixed upper limit, and the court reviews the reasonableness of the commitment. If the proportion is too high, the court may require adjustments. In practice, the percentage is usually within 10%.

Q2: Who will pay the reward money?

The applicant shall pay the reward in accordance with the commitment, and the amount shall be deducted from the funds collected during the enforcement process. In the case where the respondent bears the enforcement costs, the applicant shall still pay the reward in accordance with the commitment.

Q3: Is it effective for the debtor's own family to report him/her to the court?

The legal representatives and employees of the debtor, as well as other specific related parties, are excluded. In practice, there are disputes over the effectiveness of reports made by close relatives, and the court will review their qualifications before making payments.

Q4: After providing the clues, was the money paid out when the property was not successfully executed?

No, the payment is conditional on the actual execution of the property; for clues that are true but involve a long disposal period, it is common to pay according to the progress of the disposal.

Q5: Will the bounty notice be seen by the debtor?

The announcement may have been known to them, but that's precisely why it created pressure; in cases involving sensitive identities, the court can be contacted to issue the announcement anonymously.

The above answer is based on the judicial practice in the Beijing area. The judicial interpretations in other provinces and cities may vary. For specific cases, please refer to the local rules and evidence situations.

If you are facing similar problems, it is recommended that you consult a professional lawyer as soon as possible with the evidence materials, so as to avoid missing the statutory time limit. →Legal services for creditor-debtor disputes·Beijing Henglue Law Firm

Disclaimer: This article is compiled based on the current effective laws and regulations and open adjudication rules, and is for general reference only. It does not constitute a formal legal opinion on specific cases. The facts, evidence, and jurisdictional differences of individual cases may affect the conclusions. If you encounter disputes, please consult a practicing lawyer in time.