The lawyer explained that if the other party threatens or intimidates you during the cooling-off period, you can report it to the police and apply for a personal safety protection order. Direct litigation for divorce is not subject to the cooling-off period, and the lawyer also advised you to collect evidence.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained that the woman, in order to secure custody of the child, should prepare evidence showing that it is in the best interests of the minor child to live with her, and that there is insufficient evidence to support the other party's claim. The lawyer also advised her on arrangements for visitation rights with multiple children.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained that transferring marital joint property before divorce is illegal. According to the Civil Code, the court may award a smaller share or no share to the transferring party, and if the transfer is discovered after the divorce, the party may request a re-division of the property within three years.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained that in divorce litigation, custody rights should be granted in accordance with the principle of what is most beneficial to the minor children, with custody awarded to the mother for children under the age of two. The lawyer also advised the client to provide evidence to prove that the child lives with them, and to claim alimony and visitation rights at the same time.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained that it is always better to hire a lawyer as soon as possible after being summoned by the public security organ, and it is most beneficial to retain a lawyer before the first interrogation to protect the right to make a statement and avoid self-incrimination.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained that the approval of the review of the necessity of detention is just a suggestion to change the compulsory measures. The actual release of the detainee requires a decision by the case-handling organ, which usually takes several days to weeks.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained the value of pre-litigation legal advice: clarifying the claims, identifying evidence gaps and statute of limitations risks, and avoiding blind litigation that wastes resources.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained that the private equity fund custodian is only liable if they violate their statutory or contractual obligations and cause losses, and advised them to provide evidence of the fault and causality.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained the legal remedies for private equity exit obstacles, including negotiation, repurchase litigation, and arbitration, and provided advice on fixed anti-dilution clauses and asset tracing.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained the verification and relief path for private equity funds that cannot be liquidated, including supervision, arbitration litigation, replacing managers, and claiming compensation, and provided guidance on the rules of the Fund Law.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained that the unilateral disclaimer clauses of the merchant are not necessarily valid, and pointed out the invalid circumstances and protection rights under the Civil Code and the Consumer Rights and Interests Protection Law.
Learn more >
The lawyer advised SMEs to select templates or have lawyers review contracts based on risk classification, and listed the types of contracts that must be reviewed by lawyers and the methods of establishing a review mechanism.
Learn more >
The lawyer listed common trap clauses in contracts and explained the rules of standard clauses in the Civil Code, highlighting the key points of review and invalidation scenarios, in order to prevent contractual risks.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained that the company's external guarantees are not necessarily invalid if they are not approved by a resolution, which depends on the type of guarantee and whether the counterparty acted in good faith. The lawyer also referred to Article 16 of the Company Law and the obligation to conduct due diligence.
Learn more >
The company is suspected of committing a corporate crime, which is defined by three elements: acting in the name of the company, acting for the company's interests, and reflecting the company's will. The principle is to impose double penalties, but in some cases, only one penalty will be imposed. The responsible persons will be divided according to their roles in decision-making and execution, and...
Learn more >
