Xue Suhua

Attorney Xue Suhua currently practices at Beijing Henglu Law Firm. With over 20 years of legal practice experience, she has handled thousands of litigation and non-litigation legal cases, specializing in civil and commercial dispute resolution. She is skilled in handling cases involving marriage and family, inheritance, real estate disputes, contract disputes, and cases at the intersection of criminal and civil law. She possesses solid legal theoretical foundation and extensive practical experience in case handling, and was awarded the title of "Special Recommended Outstanding Partner Top 100" by LawXin Society in 2026.

Some successful cases

1. Large-scale high-net-worth marital and family cases

1. Chen's divorce dispute case (with a total contract value of 1 billion yuan involved)

The attorney, Chen * of the male party, handled a high-end divorce dispute involving a subject matter of 1 billion yuan, which covered multiple complex disputes including the division of corporate equity, the confirmation of ownership of multiple real estate assets at home and abroad, the identification of joint debts of the couple, and the concealment of the other party's large-scale assets. Relying on her dual professional background in economics and law, Attorney Xue * sorted through tens of thousands of bank, securities, and corporate transaction records, applied to the court to retrieve comprehensive clues about the other party's concealed assets, and combined the rules of property division and fault compensation in the Marriage and Family Chapter of the Civil Code to provide complete evidence. Ultimately, she secured the most favorable division ratio of the couple's joint property for her client and comprehensively protected the large-scale core assets.

2. Li's marital property agreement (a top 500 enterprise owner)

The attorney, Li * (on behalf of the woman), handled the marital property disputes with the actual controller of a Fortune 500 company. The man's billion-yuan assets were all tied up in factories, equipment, and company shares, coupled with the difficulties of huge corporate operating debts, marital infidelity, and investigating and obtaining evidence of children outside the marriage. Attorney Xue took into account the practical realities of the company's operations and the legitimate rights and interests of the client. After multiple rounds of consultation and negotiation, he clarified the boundaries of assets and debts, and ultimately helped the two parties sign a marital property exclusive agreement. The man paid the woman 300 million yuan in exclusive personal property in one go, maintaining the marital relationship while completely isolating the woman from the risks of corporate operating debts.

3. Guo *'s divorce and the dispute over the return of property by the third party (a listed company's legal representative)

Guo * (the woman's representative) sued the listed company's senior executive for divorce and disputes over the return of gifts to the third party. The case involved difficult facts such as the ownership of shares in overseas-listed companies, high annual salaries, multiple city properties, the man's secretly transferring large sums of money to the third party, and the existence of children born out of wedlock. Lawyer Xue's team comprehensively retrieved the man's fund flows and complete evidence chains of his infidelity, and filed a lawsuit based on the Civil Code's provisions on fault-based damages. Ultimately, the two parties reached a divorce settlement, with the man paying the woman tens of millions of yuan in compensation in one go and recovering all the large-sum assets he had gifted to the third party.

4. Divorce and property division case involving a full-time mother

After the couple got married, the woman devoted herself to family life for more than ten years. In the court trial, the man claimed that the down payment for the property was a gift from his parents, and refused to pay compensation for housework. Lawyer Xue Suhua presented evidence and defended the case from four aspects: custody rights, identification of marital joint property, separation maintenance, and compensation for housework. In court, the court overturned the effectiveness of the man's unilateral gift agreement, and ruled that the property involved in the case was marital joint property. The court ordered the man to pay 250,000 yuan as the depreciation value of the house, and supported the separation maintenance and divorce housework economic compensation, fully protecting the rights and interests of the disadvantaged woman.

5. The divorce fault division case of Yu *

The woman entrusted Lawyer Xue to handle the divorce dispute with the man involving cohabitation with a third party during their marriage. During the trial, she applied to the court to obtain the police report, the transaction records of the man's accounts on all platforms (bank cards, WeChat, Alipay), and fully provided evidence of the man's major faults during the marriage. The court ruled to grant the divorce, with custody of the two children granted to the woman, and the man required to pay 8,000 yuan in monthly alimony. The woman was awarded 60% of the couple's jointly owned property.

6. Guo *'s objection to the jurisdiction of the divorce case

The parties involved do not want to divorce, wish to maintain their marriage, and require the case to be heard in Beijing. Lawyer Xue reviewed the jurisdictional legal rules, submitted an application for jurisdiction objection, and successfully transferred the case from another city to the Dongcheng District Court in Beijing for trial. During the trial, the court fully demonstrated that the couple's marital relationship has not completely broken down, and both parties are willing to repair their relationship for the sake of their children. The court rejected all divorce petitions on the grounds that the other party lacks sufficient evidence of marital breakdown.

II. Disputes over the inheritance of large sums of wealth

1. Li *'s inheritance dispute case (with a dispute value of 50 million yuan)

Attorney Li * handled the inheritance case of her husband's massive assets. The situation of property commingling was complex, and it was extremely difficult to distinguish between pre-marital personal property, marital joint property, the deceased's external debts, and marital joint debts. Attorney Xue * sorted out the ownership of the property and the boundaries of debt assumption in layers, designed a multi-layered progressive litigation plan, clarified the ownership of various assets, and ultimately helped the client successfully inherit all the legal assets worth 50 million yuan.

2. The inheritance case of Yang's family (with an estimated value of 30 million yuan)

The agent handled the division of the family's massive inheritance on behalf of the spouse of the successor, which included equity in family businesses, multiple real estate properties across the country, and large financial assets. At the same time, there were conflicts of validity among multiple wills and disputes over the eligibility of the heirs. The team provided evidence to prove the legality of the notarized will, distinguished between pre-marital and post-marital inheritance, and excluded the invalidity of the will. In the end, the court divided the inheritance according to the valid notarized will, and the client obtained 60% of the inheritance share, resolving the internal property conflicts within the family.

3. The case of Zhang *'s donation contract being retried and given a different verdict in the second instance

The grandmother privately gifted the couple's multi-million-yuan property to her grandson. The appellant, Zhang * , entrusted lawyer Xue Suhua to protect her rights in the second instance. The lawyer accurately argued that the property belonged to the couple's jointly owned property and that the unilateral gift had no right to dispose of it. The second-instance court ruled that the gift was invalid as a whole, and Zhang * successfully obtained her share of the property worth 1.5 million yuan.

4. The case of property inheritance involving X*, Yang*, and Ma* (with a total value of over 4.3 million yuan)

The stepchildren sued to divide the property of the deceased elderly, and the defendant's agent, Ma * appeared in court to defend himself. Through complete evidence of the full sources of funds for the house and the validity of the legal self-written will, the Haidian Court dismissed all the plaintiffs' claims, thus saving the parties from a property loss of more than 4.3 million yuan.

III. Real estate and property rights disputes (with a single case involving a subject matter worth 5 million to 20 million yuan)

1. A case where the second-instance court remanded the case for rehearing after confirming the ownership of the house

In the appeal of the agent, Hu *'s housing ownership dispute, the lawyer accurately pointed out the core loopholes in the fact-finding and evidence acceptance of the first-instance judgment. The second-instance court ruled that the case be remanded for retrial, successfully protecting the client's property rights worth millions of yuan.

2. The lawsuit to revoke the house-buying and selling contract between Yuan * and Hou *

My grandfather sued to revoke the transfer of the property and reclaim the 8-million-yuan property. Attorney Xue provided evidence that the two parties had a genuine gift agreement and that the transfer registration was complete and legal. The court dismissed all of the plaintiff's claims, and the parties fully retained ownership of the property.

3. The case of Cui *'s demolition and division of a small property right house

On behalf of the buyer of the small property rights house, the other party refused to divide the resettlement rights when the house was demolished. The lawyer obtained the complete demolition and resettlement agreement, evidence of years of actual occupation, and proof of performance of payment, breaking through the common difficulties in judicial adjudication of small property rights houses. The court ruled that all the demolition compensation of more than 450,000 yuan and the 187㎡ resettlement house belong to our client.

4. Lawsuit against the defendant who bought a villa under someone else's name

The plaintiff sued to demand the forced transfer of the multi-million-yuan villa registered under the defendant's name. Attorney Xue fully provided evidence showing that there was no written agreement for borrowing the name, all the funds for purchasing the house were provided by the defendant, and the defendant had been using the house for a long time. The court rejected all the plaintiff's demands for transfer, and the parties fully retained the ownership of the villa.

5. Dispute over the validity of a house purchase and sale contract (with a contract value of 80 million yuan)

The attorney representing the plaintiff sued to confirm the invalidity of the existing housing sales contract, and the case involved multiple related companies and complex multi-layered fund transfers. Xue Suhua's team sorted through massive evidence of transfers and transaction contracts, clarified the multi-layered legal relationships, and precisely formulated a litigation plan. In the end, the court ruled that the housing sales contract in question was invalid, helping the company recover a huge economic loss of nearly 80 million yuan.

6. Cases where the second-instance court reversed the original judgment on the validity of the contract

The first-instance court ruled that the entire house purchase contract was invalid, and the parties appealed and entrusted Lawyer Xue Suhua to handle the case. During the trial, the court distinguished the legal boundaries of marital joint property and inheritance shares, and argued that only the transactions corresponding to the inheritance part were flawed, while the remaining transactions were legal and valid. On appeal, the second-instance court reversed the first-instance court's ruling that the entire contract was invalid, protecting the parties' core property rights interests in the house.

7. Case of revised judgment on housing compensation after divorce in the second instance

In the second instance, the attorney represented the woman in the appeal for the division of the property after the divorce. The court re-calculated the increase in the value of the house and the corresponding compensation standards for the loan repayment. The court adopted all the attorney's opinions and reduced the woman's compensation for the house from 1.426 million yuan to 1.17 million yuan, directly reducing her obligation to pay by 260,000 yuan.

IV. Family cases involving custody rights and marital freedom

1. The case of an 80-year-old elderly person who was divorced and had his judgment changed in the second instance

In the first instance, Yang, who was in his eighties, was ruled not to be granted a divorce and entrusted Xue, a lawyer, to appeal. After collecting comprehensive evidence showing that the couple had been separated for more than ten years, their relationship had completely broken down, and there was no possibility of reconciliation, the second-instance court overturned the first-instance judgment and granted the elderly couple a divorce, safeguarding the elderly's freedom of marriage.

2. Case of changing the judgment on custody rights in the second instance

In the first instance, the custody of the children was awarded to the father. Lawyer Xue Suhua represented the mother in the second instance appeal, providing sufficient evidence that the children had been cared for by the mother for a long time and that the father's behavior was detrimental to the children's growth. She exposed the evidence loopholes of the other party inducing the children to make false statements, and successfully changed the custody to the mother in the second instance. The court ordered the father to pay 10,000 yuan in child support per month.

5. Large-scale commercial disputes in construction projects

A construction contract dispute case between a certain construction group in Shaanxi and China Railway XX Bureau (with a contract value of 500 million yuan)

The defendant's agent, Shaanxi * Construction Group, defended against a lawsuit involving a 500 million yuan highway project section. The case involved multiple disputes, including project incremental accounting, determination of losses due to project suspension, and the return of quality deposit. The team reviewed over 3,000 pages of project signing documents and construction logs, applied to the court for a judicial appraisal of the project cost, and refuted the unreasonable claims of the other party based on the "Judicial Interpretation of Construction Projects" article by article. The court accepted all of our project payment pricing standards, helping the company avoid the risk of huge compensation.

VI. Contracts and commercial creditor's rights disputes

1. Case of changing the judgment on the effectiveness of the family partition agreement in the second instance

The first-instance court found that there were flaws in the property division agreement and ruled that the agreement was invalid. Lawyer Xue Suhua represented the appellant and argued that the agreement was a true expression of the intention of all family members and did not fall into any legally invalid circumstances. The first-instance court applied the law incorrectly. The second-instance court reversed the original judgment and confirmed that both property division agreements were completely legal and valid in accordance with the law.

2. Disputes over refunds for intermediary service contracts

The client entrusted an intermediary to handle the household registration in Beijing, but the registration was not completed after paying a service fee of 150,000 yuan, and the intermediary refused to refund the money. Lawyer Xue collected complete evidence including the intermediary contract, transfer records, and communication records. After suing the intermediary, the court mediated the case, and the intermediary fully refunded the service fee of 100,000 yuan.

VII. Economic criminal defense cases

\nDefense case of not prosecuting the crime of counterfeiting registered trademarks

The amount of money involved in the case exceeded 640,000 yuan, and the defendant was suspected of the crime of counterfeiting registered trademarks. Lawyer Xue Suhua's team reviewed all the mitigating circumstances, including voluntary surrender, full restitution of the illicit proceeds, obtaining the understanding of the victimized enterprise, and voluntary admission of guilt and punishment. They issued a professional non-prosecution legal opinion, and the prosecutor's office fully adopted the defense viewpoint. Ultimately, a non-prosecution decision was made, and the defendant did not have a criminal record, thus avoiding criminal punishment.

VIII. Full-time legal advisory services for enterprises

For a long time, we have been providing full-process legal services to manufacturing, construction, trade, medical, listed companies, and family businesses: equity structure design, drafting and risk review of various commercial contracts, collection of corporate receivables, pre-mediation of shareholder disputes, formulation of investment and financing asset isolation plans, and proactive avoidance of major legal risks such as corporate operations and shareholder marital property confusion.