Chen Ping

1. Chen * and Wang *'s house sale contract dispute case. Due to the price of the house rising by more than twice, Wang * breached the contract and refused to sell the house. Attorney Chen Ping represented Chen * to sue for the transfer of ownership, and the case was finally won.

2. A dispute over the sale contract between a certain company and Ningbo Belda Company. Ningbo Belda Company defaulted on the payment of more than 500,000 yuan to the certain company. Attorney Chen sued several related companies and helped the two parties reach a settlement, successfully recovering the overdue payment.

3. A dispute over the confirmation of ownership of a house between Tang * and Zhu * and Zhou *. Tang * purchased a demolition house through introduction, but when it came to the time of transferring ownership, Zhu * and Zhou * breached the contract by not transferring ownership due to the price of the house rising by more than three times. Attorney Chen represented Tang * and won the lawsuit, requiring the other party to transfer ownership.

4. A divorce dispute between Wu * and Qian *. Attorney Chen represented Wu * in suing for divorce. Qian * had a written promise in the marriage that he would leave with nothing if he cheated. After litigation and mediation, an agreement was reached, and the man, Qian *, agreed to leave with nothing, which greatly protected Wu *'s interests.

5. The civil loan dispute case between Fang * and Huang *, Zhang *, and * Real Estate Company. In 2011, Fang * lent 3 million yuan to Huang *, and Zhang * and * Real Estate Company served as guarantors. Later, Huang * was unable to repay the loan, and Attorney Chen represented Fang * to recover part of the outstanding debt through litigation.

6. The legal inheritance dispute case between Cai * Shi and Cai * Chuan, Cai * Da, and Cai * Xue. Cai * Shi's father obtained four resettlement houses and more than 500,000 yuan in compensation through demolition. The property was occupied and divided by other siblings. Attorney Chen represented Cai * Shi and helped him successfully recover his share of the property.

7. The partnership agreement dispute case between Du * and Lin *. Du * and Lin * jointly operated a cinema and eight storefronts. Later, Lin * did not recognize the fact of partnership operation and did not divide the partnership income, causing a dispute. Attorney Chen, through litigation, confirmed the parties' partnership relationship and obtained the corresponding partnership income.

8. In the case of Jing *'s dispute with a Beijing-based company over a network service contract, Jing * invested over 800,000 yuan in online games. The network company suspended all of his accounts due to his alleged violations of operating rules. Attorney Chen represented Jing * and, through litigation, the two parties eventually reached an agreement, allowing Jing * to successfully retrieve his game accounts worth over 800,000 yuan.