A 35-year-old man sued his underage lover to return 145,000 yuan, but Song Chao, a lawyer from Henglu Law Firm in Beijing, rejected all the plaintiff's claims on his behalf.
Learn more >
After the lessee signed the confirmation letter, he absconded. Attorney Zhu Guiying from Beijing Henglu Law Firm determined that the contract was a preliminary contract and awarded the lessee 365,000 yuan in compensation for the renovation costs.
Learn more >
The employee sued the company for illegal termination. Attorney Chen Ping of Beijing Henglu Law Firm provided evidence of objective changes in the situation and the negotiation process. The second-instance court upheld the legality of the termination.
Learn more >
The former employee's claim for 340,000 yuan was rejected in its entirety. Attorney Chen Mei'e from Beijing Henglu Law Firm represented the company, and the arbitration court dismissed the claims for wage differences and compensation.
Learn more >
It took seven years for the unfair compensation decision to be issued. The administrative litigation represented by lawyers Cheng Chunmei and Qiu Juan of Beijing Henglu Law Firm led to the decision being revoked and the authorities being ordered to make a new one.
Learn more >
The unit refused to sign the contract on the grounds of position elimination, and the attorney of Beijing Hengluo Law Firm, Shang Jiangpeng, confirmed that there is no fixed-term labor relationship since July 1, 2022.
Learn more >
The employer failed to pay the employees' salaries on time. Attorney Peng Jiangpeng from Beijing Henglu Law Firm handled the labor dispute and confirmed that the employees' working years were continuously calculated for 14 years, helping the client obtain an economic compensation of 96,000 yuan.
Learn more >
The settlement agreement was denied, and there is a dispute over the waiver of interest clauses. Attorney Li Yonghui from Beijing Henglu Law Firm represented the client in the construction contract dispute, fully supporting the claim for over 2.37 million yuan in project payments and interest.
Learn more >
The settlement statement confirmed a debt of more than 280,000 yuan, but the payment was rejected due to unresolved issues. Beijing Hengluo Subuke Law Firm represented the subcontractor in the dispute, and the court ruled that the full amount should be paid.
Learn more >
The company denied the validity of the project manager's signature. Attorney Li Yonghui from Beijing Henglu Law Firm used social security records and judgments from other cases to prove his point, helping the client recover more than 1.5 million yuan in project payments and interest.
Learn more >
The developer claimed nearly 300,000 yuan in breach of contract penalties. Wang Fangli, an attorney from Beijing Henglu Law Firm, represented the buyer in the lawsuit. After the court reduced the amount, the buyer only paid 40,000 yuan in breach of contract penalties and returned the purchase price.
Learn more >
The developer breached the contract by failing to deliver the agreed upon relocation housing and even demanded a discounted price. Beijing Hengluwenpinliang Law Firm filed a lawsuit and a counterclaim against the developer, and in the end, the parties reached a settlement agreement under which the developer agreed to deliver the housing and parking spaces as stipulated in the contract.
Learn more >
The rural house was forcibly demolished by the town government. Attorney Dawei Yu from Beijing Henglu Law Firm represented the client. The court confirmed that the forced demolition was illegal and protected the client's rights and interests.
Learn more >
The fence and weighbridge of the courtyard were forcibly demolished on the grounds of road construction. Qiu Juan, a lawyer from Beijing Hengluo Law Firm, acted as the agent for the plaintiff. The court ruled that the forced demolition was illegal.
Learn more >
The first-instance arbitration only partially supported the claimant's request. Feng Na, a lawyer from Beijing Hengluo Law Firm, represented the claimant in the second-instance arbitration, and the arbitral tribunal ruled in favor of the claimant on issues such as the performance bonus difference and the unpaid annual leave salary.
Learn more >
