The "investment agreement" was actually a loan. Feng Na, a lawyer from Beijing Hengluo Law Firm, accurately identified its nature and helped the client recover the principal and interest of 500,000 yuan.
Learn more >
The "first case" of mining contract disputes, represented by Attorney Wu Jiani of Beijing Henglu Law Firm, rejected all the claims of the other party and helped the client recover more than 10.94 million yuan.
Learn more >
3 million yuan in loans are overdue. Attorney Peng Xinyue from Beijing Henglu Law Firm represented the borrower, and the court fully supported the claim for the principal, overdue interest, liquidated damages, and attorney's fees.
Learn more >
The company unilaterally dismissed the employee for serious violations of the system. Feng Na, a lawyer from Beijing Hengluo Law Firm, represented the employee in the arbitration and helped the worker obtain more than 280,000 yuan in compensation for the illegal dismissal.
Learn more >
During her maternity leave, she was transferred to a new employment relationship and was owed unpaid wages. Attorney Feng Na from Beijing Henglu Law Firm represented her and helped the worker obtain more than 120,000 yuan in economic compensation for the termination of the employment contract.
Learn more >
The purpose of cooperating to import coal failed. Xue Suhua, an attorney with Beijing Henglu Law Firm, acted as the agent for the plaintiff. The court ruled that the defendant should return 900,000 yuan of coal payment and interest, and the shareholders should bear joint and several liability.
Learn more >
The plastic engineering project was rejected for repair due to insufficient thickness of the drum bag. Attorney Wang Fangli of Beijing Henglu Law Firm represented the plaintiff, and the court ruled that the defendant should compensate the plaintiff for the losses of 50,000 yuan.
Learn more >
The town government demolished the building by force during the appeal period, using the pretext of demolishing illegal structures. The case was handled by lawyer Qiu Juan of Beijing Hengluo Law Firm, and the court confirmed that the forced demolition was illegal.
Learn more >
The resettlement housing was included in the enforcement action initiated by the ex-husband. Attorneys Li Yonghui and Fu Xiaofei from Beijing Henglu Law Firm successfully defended the lawsuit against the enforcement action and preserved the two sets of housing.
Learn more >
The enterprise's decision on forced demolition and the decision on reconsideration were revoked by the second-instance court. The lawyers He Meng and Xi Chao Li from Beijing Hengluo Shangrui Chao Law Firm represented the client, and the court ruled to revoke the original judgment and the decisions on forced demolition and reconsideration.
Learn more >
The loan of 150,000 yuan was evidenced by a promissory note and a transfer record. The other party refused to repay the loan and failed to appear in court. Beijing Henglu Law Firm successfully represented the client and obtained a judgment ordering the other party to repay the principal of 150,000 yuan and pay interest at a monthly rate of 1%.
Learn more >
The legal housing ancillary facilities were forcibly demolished without compensation. Lawyer Qiu Juan of Beijing Hengluo Law Firm represented the client. Both the first and second instance courts ruled that the forced demolition was illegal and applied the Administrative Enforcement Law.
Learn more >
Wang Dong, a lawyer from Beijing Hengluo Law Firm, handled a divorce case and helped the woman obtain custody of the child, split the 950,000 yuan in savings equally with the man, and receive 600,000 yuan in house discount money.
Learn more >
The man cheated on his wife and committed domestic violence. Attorney Ye Qingyu from Beijing Henglu Law Firm helped the woman obtain custody of the child and won 5,000 yuan in compensation for mental distress.
Learn more >
The brothers disputed over the rights to renovate the old house. Lawyer Xiong Binrong from Beijing Henglu Law Firm represented them and successfully dismissed the other party's claim of 400,000 yuan, with the court only awarding compensation of 65,000 yuan.
Learn more >
