[Direct answer]In the Beijing area, if a company is reported for commercial bribery, it should first distinguish whether it is an administrative report, a criminal case, or a civil complaint, and immediately conduct internal verification and evidence collection. According to Article 7 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China (amended on April 23, 2019), operators shall not bribe the staff of the counterparties to transactions, units or individuals entrusted by the counterparties to handle relevant matters, or units or individuals who use their power or influence to influence transactions, in order to seek transaction opportunities or competitive advantages; Article 19 stipulates the corresponding legal responsibilities. According to the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and relevant judicial interpretations, giving a large amount of property for the purpose of seeking improper benefits may constitute the crime of bribing non-state employees or the crime of bribing units. The company should evaluate the nature of the act, the amount and circumstances, and then decide on the path of cooperating with the investigation, rectifying, or defending itself. Similar issues can be referred to for reference.Business and contract disputes in enterprisesColumn.
1. Problem background and typical scenarios
These situations are commonly encountered in several scenarios: First, the trading counterpart or competitor reports to the market supervision, discipline inspection and supervision, or public security authorities that the company has given kickbacks or rebates; Second, employees privately bribe clients for personal performance, and the company is implicated; Third, the bidding and procurement process is reported to involve commercial bribery; Fourth, partners bribe third parties to facilitate transactions, and the company is listed as a joint investigation target; Fifth, internal whistleblowers or departing employees report to regulatory authorities in their real names. When handling such cases in Beijing, it is usually first necessary to determine the nature of the report and the jurisdiction authority, then assess whether the act constitutes a crime, the amount involved, and the subjective intent, and if necessary, combine these factors with other evidence to determine the final legal consequences.Land expropriation and demolition, and administrative litigationThe column comprehensively summarizes the rules regarding administrative compliance.
II. Key points of contention
First, whether the behavior constitutes commercial bribery, that is, whether it seeks trading opportunities or competitive advantages through financial or other means. Second, the identification of the subject, whether it is a company's behavior or an employee's personal behavior. Third, whether the amount and circumstances meet the criminal filing standards. Fourth, whether the counterparties in the transaction are aware of and accept the bribe, which affects the qualification of the crime. Fifth, whether the company has established compliance systems and fulfilled its management responsibilities, which affects the severity of the punishment. Sixth, the connection between administrative and criminal responsibilities. Seventh, the defense of the authenticity of the report and the counter-evidence. The specific determination shall be based on the current effective laws and regulations and judicial rulings. For related contract disputes, please refer to the relevant provisions.Business and contract disputes in enterprisesColumn.
III. Professional analysis by Henglue Law Firm
Based on the practical experience of the lawyers handled by our firm, the key to dealing with commercial bribery is to first conduct an internal compliance audit and then respond externally. Lawyers usually first assist companies in sorting out the business processes, contracts, and financial transactions that have been reported, distinguishing between the company's will and employees' personal actions; then assess whether there are high-risk actions such as off-book kickbacks and false expense reimbursements. If the report is true, it is necessary to establish a rectification and compliance system as soon as possible, actively explain the situation to regulators, and strive for lenient punishment; if the report is untrue, it is necessary to collect counter-evidence, clarify the transaction background, and demonstrate its commercial rationality. The lawyers handled by our firm pay attention to restoring the facts through contracts, financial vouchers, and approval flows, so as to avoid the company being held accountable for the actions of individual employees. For cases involving administrative investigations, it is possible to refer to them simultaneously.Land expropriation and demolition, and administrative litigationColumn.
IV. Practical suggestions and legal basis
Action suggestions: First, immediately suspend relevant transactions and seal financial and contractual materials upon receiving a report or an investigation notice. Relevant compliance points can be referred to for referenceSpecial services and other casesFirst, clarify the responsibilities of company directors and senior managers in anti-corruption compliance. Second, distinguish between corporate actions and personal actions, and fix the evidence of approval and authorization. Third, sort out the flow of funds and the authenticity of expenses, and investigate off-book expenditures. Fourth, cooperate with regulatory investigations but make cautious statements, and have lawyers communicate on behalf of them when necessary. Fifth, establish or improve anti-commercial bribery compliance systems to reduce the risk of recurrence. In terms of legal basis, Article 7 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China prohibits operators from bribing to seek trading opportunities or competitive advantages, and was amended on April 23, 2019; Article 19 stipulates administrative responsibilities such as fines and confiscation of illegal income; if it constitutes a crime, criminal responsibility shall be investigated in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China on bribery-related crimes.
5. Henglu Law Firm's Reminder
Risk Warning: First, the boundaries between administrative and criminal liability for commercial bribery need to be carefully judged, and the amount and circumstances determine whether a criminal case will be initiated; Second, if the company is aware of or tacitly approves of an employee's personal behavior, it may be regarded as a company's act; Third, off-book kickbacks and false reimbursements are high-risk points and should be inspected with priority; Fourth, statements made during the investigation must be consistent with the evidence to avoid contradictions; Fifth, establishing a compliance system can serve as evidence for reducing liability and making rectifications. It is recommended to engage professional lawyers to conduct verification as soon as possible. For related corporate affairs, you can consult professional lawyers for comprehensive planning.
VI. Frequently Asked Questions
Q1: What consequences will a company face if it is reported for commercial bribery?
The consequences depend on the nature and amount of the bribe. Administratively, according to the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, the offender may be fined, have the illegal income confiscated, or even have their business license revoked. Criminally, if the amount of money given for improper benefits is large, it may constitute the crime of bribing non-state employees or the crime of bribing units, and the responsible person will face criminal punishment. If it is an employee's personal act and the company is unaware of it and has fulfilled its management responsibilities, the company's liability will be relatively light. The key is to timely distinguish the subject of the act and the amount, and to evaluate the levels of administrative and criminal risks.
Q2: What evidence should the company prepare if it is reported for violations?
The following materials should be prepared: contracts and approval processes of the reported business, to prove the transaction background and authorization; financial vouchers and bank statements, to prove the real purpose of the funds; expense reimbursement and commission policies, to distinguish normal business arrangements from off-the-books kickbacks; employee responsibilities and compliance training records, to prove the company's management responsibilities; and internal reports or investigation materials. These materials are used to clarify whether the actions are company-initiated or individual actions, and whether there is any improper transfer of interests, which is the basis for responding to the situation.
Q3: How much does it cost to deal with a commercial bribery investigation?
The fees include attorney fees and the potential cost of compliance rectification. Attorney fees are negotiated based on the complexity of the case, the level of investigation, and the amount involved; if the case proceeds to administrative litigation or criminal litigation, fees will be charged separately according to the procedures. Building a compliance system and conducting internal investigations will also incur costs. The specific amount will be assessed based on the nature of the report, the amount involved, and the business scope. It is recommended to first conduct a preliminary assessment of the risk level and then determine the budget for compliance and litigation response.
Q4: How long does it usually take to handle a commercial bribery case?
An administrative investigation may take several months to a year, depending on the pace of the regulatory authority. If the case is transferred to criminal prosecution, the investigation, review, and trial periods will be even longer, possibly ranging from one to several years. Internal compliance checks within the company usually take several weeks to a few months. The key is to immediately seal the information and fix the evidence after receiving the clues, so as to avoid the investigation expanding. It is recommended to engage a lawyer as soon as possible to shorten the uncertainty period and control the scope of responsibility.
Q5: What should a company do first after being reported?
The first step is to immediately suspend the transactions involved and seal the contracts, financial documents, and approval materials to prevent the loss of evidence. The second step is to conduct an internal investigation into the reported issues, distinguishing between company actions and individual actions. The third step is to assess the amount and circumstances to determine whether they meet the standards for initiating a criminal case. The fourth step is to cooperate with regulatory investigations cautiously, with lawyers communicating and making statements on behalf of the company. The fifth step is to establish a system for rectification and compliance. For reference, please refer to the following document:Beijing Henglue Law FirmFor similar compliance cases on the official website, it's advisable to engage professional lawyers as soon as possible to reduce risks.
The above answer is based on the judicial practice in Beijing. The judicial interpretation in other provinces and cities may vary. For specific cases, please refer to the local rules and evidence situations.
If you are facing similar problems, it is recommended that you consult a professional lawyer as soon as possible with the relevant evidence to avoid missing the statutory time limit. →Business and commercial legal services·Beijing Henglu Law Firm
Disclaimer: This article is compiled based on the current effective laws and regulations and open adjudication rules, and is for general reference only. It does not constitute a formal legal opinion on specific cases. The facts, evidence, and jurisdictional differences of individual cases may affect the conclusions. If a dispute arises, please consult a practicing lawyer in time.