The lawyer explained how to deal with unresolved compensation issues in the demolition of a livestock farm: disclose information to verify the legality of the project, request a reconsideration within 60 days, file a lawsuit within six months, and cite the example of the implementation of a compensation of 309,000 yuan.
Learn more >
The lawyer reviewed the five major items of compensation for the demolition of shops: the value of the house, the losses from production and business suspension, the temporary relocation and resettlement, the decoration and ancillary facilities, and the rewards. He also interpreted the disputes over the distribution of compensation to lessees and the evaluation standards.
Learn more >
Attorney's Interpretation of the Risks of Forced Demolition and Remedies after Receiving the Decision on Compensation for Expropriation: Filing a lawsuit within six months or initiating a reconsideration within 60 days can prevent forced demolition. Forced demolition must be implemented upon the court's decision.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained the key points of choosing between monetary compensation and property rights exchange: the compensation method is chosen by the expropriated person in accordance with the law, the appraised value shall not be lower than the market price, and the appraisal report and the terms of the resettlement housing should be reviewed before signing the contract.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained the remedies available after signing the demolition agreement: revoking the agreement within one year due to fraud or coercion, claiming its invalidity if the subject is not qualified, and continuing to enforce the agreement if it is not implemented. An example of an arbitration case confirming the invalidity of the village committee's agreement was also provided.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained the four major roles of information disclosure in land expropriation and demolition: verifying the legality of the expropriation, fixing the evidence of compensation, identifying procedural flaws and qualified defendants, and ordering the defendant to perform its duties if it fails to respond within the time limit and is subject to a reconsideration order.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained the key points of the lawsuit against the forced demolition of the house: filing a lawsuit within six months, identifying the subject of the forced demolition, claiming that the procedure of not applying for court enforcement is illegal, and linking it with the rules of administrative compensation and the reversal of the burden of proof.
Learn more >
The lawyer reviews the key points of the review of the compensation and resettlement plan for the shantytown renovation: the legality of the project, the completeness of the compensation methods, the requirement that the public consultation lasts no less than 30 days, and the evaluation report must be confirmed. Attached are cases of revoking the compensation decision and ordering the redoing of t...
Learn more >
The lawyer explained the remedial path for unreasonable compensation in expropriation: applying for a hearing at the planning stage, reviewing the evaluation, seeking reconsideration within 60 days or filing a lawsuit within six months, and attaching cases of the firm successfully revoking illegal responses through reconsideration.
Learn more >
The lawyer analyzed the path to resolving disputes over compensation for the expropriation of residential plots: combining information disclosure, administrative reconsideration, litigation, and applications for official duties to apply pressure, and citing an example where an unregistered land owner received compensation of 309,000 yuan.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained the timing of the right to review the case file: According to Article 38 of the Criminal Procedure Law, the defendant can review and copy the case file from the date of review and prosecution. During the investigation stage, the defendant can only meet with his/her lawyer, and his/her family members do not have the right to directly review the case file.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained the value of entrusting a criminal incidental civil lawsuit: the scope of compensation, the organization of evidence, and the execution of mediation all affect the compensation, and he cited an example of an intentional homicide case in which the incidental civil claim was supported.
Learn more >
The full process of a lawyer handling a criminal case: verifying the lawyer's qualifications, entrusting the lawyer, meeting with the client, applying for bail within the "golden 37 days", reviewing the prosecution file, attending the court hearing to provide defense, and citing examples of bail applications and death penalty defense cases.
Learn more >
The lawyer explained the pros and cons of hiring local versus out-of-town criminal defense attorneys: While the defense rights are the same, the local advantage lies in the convenience of meetings and communication. What really matters are professional competence and case-handling experience. The article also provided examples of obtaining bail after prosecution.
Learn more >
During the review stage of the death penalty, lawyers can submit opinions and apply for face-to-face statements. Article 251 of the Criminal Procedure Law requires that lawyers' opinions be heard. Since 2007, the authority to approve the death penalty has been centralized with the Supreme People's Court, with a review period and relief guidance attached.
Learn more >
