Generally, illegal construction itself is not compensated, but if the illegal demolition causes damage to legal property, compensation can be requested in accordance with the State Compensation Law; losses of items in the house can also be claimed.
Learn more >
The fees charged for legal services related to expropriation and demolition are aligned with the complexity of the case, the subject matter, and the stage of the process. For administrative cases, risk-based representation is prohibited by law. It is recommended to carefully review the fee breakdown and the stages included before entrusting the case to a lawyer.
Learn more >
The disputes over compensation for housing expropriation involve the amount of the agreement, the disclosure of information, and the state compensation procedures. Professional lawyers can help you secure evidence, confirm violations of the law, and seek compensation. It is recommended to assess the case based on the specific circumstances.
Learn more >
If the procedure for identifying illegal buildings is illegal, the identification act may be revoked through administrative reconsideration or litigation; the forced demolition must be announced in accordance with the law and guarantee the right to administrative reconsideration and litigation, and an application for administrative reconsideration may be made within 60 days.
Learn more >
When signing the housing expropriation compensation agreement, it is necessary to verify the scope of expropriation and the qualifications of the contracting parties. The agreement should specify the compensation method, amount, payment period, and property rights exchange. If the conditions are not met, the parties can request a reconsideration or file a lawsuit to avoid falling into the trap of ...
Learn more >
The risk of a not-guilty defense depends on whether there are facts and evidence to support it. To secure a conviction, the standard of proof requires clear evidence of the crime and sufficient corroborating evidence. If there is insufficient evidence, the defendant should be given a favorable ruling. It is recommended that a lawyer review the case file and assess its feasibility.
Learn more >
To determine the professional field of a criminal defense lawyer, check whether they have long been focused on criminal law, have experience in similar cases, and have a clear defense strategy; verify their practice information through their official website, and judge based on real cases. Don't believe in the promise that winning is guaranteed through connections.
Learn more >
After being detained criminally, the key to hiring a lawyer is to act promptly and correctly: a defendant can appoint a lawyer from the first interrogation or enforcement measures onwards. The lawyer can meet with the defendant upon presenting his/her practicing certificate. It is necessary to verify the practicing certificate and refuse private fees and unrealistic promises.
Learn more >
To prevent criminal risks in business operations, enterprises should embed criminal compliance into their daily decision-making and business processes. Supervisors may be held accountable for corporate crimes. It is recommended to establish compliance review and major legal argument mechanisms, and to invite professional criminal lawyers to intervene as soon as clues are found.
Learn more >
When hiring a criminal lawyer, it is necessary to sign a written agency agreement and a power of attorney, which clearly specify the stages of representation, the scope of authority, and the fees charged. Law firms shall charge fees in a standardized manner, and it is strictly prohibited to transfer funds privately or make promises of guaranteed victory.
Learn more >
After a family member is detained by the police, the family should promptly verify the detention location, hire a lawyer to meet with the detainee, avoid colluding to destroy evidence, and seize the golden period of 37 days to strive for bail pending trial.
Learn more >
The core of corporate criminal crisis response is early detection, early isolation, professional intervention, and unified statements; lawyers can meet with clients and review case files during the investigation stage, and apply for bail and conduct a review of the necessity of detention.
Learn more >
Even if the embezzled money is returned, it may still constitute a crime. Returning the embezzled money is a mitigating circumstance rather than a reason for acquittal. Whether to initiate a prosecution depends on the amount of money involved and the evidence. It is recommended to consult a lawyer as soon as possible.
Learn more >
A criminal risk check is a systematic criminal compliance review conducted by lawyers on the operating behaviors and systems of an enterprise before an incident occurs. It aims to identify red lines such as embezzlement and bribery and provide a rectification plan.
Learn more >
The jurisdiction of criminal retrial shall be determined according to the initiating entity: the higher court may initiate the retrial or order the retrial; the party may file an appeal with the original court or the higher court, or request the procuratorate to file a protest against the judgment.
Learn more >
